Interocean oil development company

Established in 1961, INTEROCEAN has proudly completed 50 years of unparalleled service to its clients in India and world wide. The group has over the years expanded into various activities such as : Home Interocean Oil Development Company and Interocean Oil Exploration Company v. Federal Republic of Nigeria. About Us. The International Arbitration Society established the Arbitration Database in May 2008. It is a website destined to become one of the biggest free online databases for lawyers and scholars seeking articles and cases related

The Claimants are Interocean Oil Development Company and Interocean Oil Exploration Company, both of which were incorporated under the laws of Delaware and maintain registered offices at 901 N. Market Street, Suite 705, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, U.S.A. Established in 1961, INTEROCEAN has proudly completed 50 years of unparalleled service to its clients in India and world wide. The group has over the years expanded into various activities such as : Home Interocean Oil Development Company and Interocean Oil Exploration Company v. Federal Republic of Nigeria. About Us. The International Arbitration Society established the Arbitration Database in May 2008. It is a website destined to become one of the biggest free online databases for lawyers and scholars seeking articles and cases related Interocean Group of Companies We have been involved in the Indian Oil and Gas Exploration industry ever since ONGC commissioned it’s first commercial oil exploration at Bombay High.

Panocean is the operator of Oil Mining Lease (OML) 98, a joint venture between Panocean and the federal government, through the NNPC. The Interocean entities, which are foreign investors in the Nigeria’s oil and gas industry, are insisting that they are the beneficial owners of the 40 per cent stake in OML 98, while the NNPC owns the remaining 60 per cent.

Panocean is the operator of Oil Mining Lease (OML) 98, a joint venture between Panocean and the federal government, through the NNPC. The Interocean entities, which are foreign investors in the Nigeria’s oil and gas industry, are insisting that they are the beneficial owners of the 40 per cent stake in OML 98, while the NNPC owns the remaining 60 per cent. Interocean Oil Development Company and Interocean Oil Exploration Company v Nigeria - ICSID Case No. ARB/13/20 - Decision on Preliminary Objections - 29 October 2014 The Oil, Gas & Energy Law Intelligence (OGEL, ISSN 1875-418X) Journal and OGELFORUM listserv focus on recent developments in the area of oil, gas, energy law, regulation, treaties, judicial and arbitral cases, voluntary guidelines, tax and contracting, including the oil, gas, energy geopolitics. As a company, Interocean performs a number of other services in the wider marine industry, including being flag state inspectors for the Republic of Marshall Islands and the Republic of Vanuatu, providing casualty response, marine warranty and assurance services and mooring equipment hire and installation services. Interocean entities, comprising Interocean Oil Development Company (Nigeria) and Interocean Oil Exploration Company (Nigeria), companies incorporated under the laws of Delaware in the United States, have dragged the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) and one Dr. Festus Fadeyi to both the Federal High Court in Lagos and the Court of Appeal, also in Lagos, over the ownership of Pan Ocean Oil Corporation of Nigeria (Panocean). Interocean Oil Development Company and Interocean Oil Exploration Company v. Federal Republic of Nigeria (ICSID Case No. ARB/13/20) Procedural Order No. 6 (English) February 1, 2017 _ Marfin Investment Group Holdings S.A., Alexandros Bakatselos and others v. Republic of Cyprus (ICSID Case No. ARB/13/27) Procedural Order No. 3 (English) Interocean provides Marine Warranty Services, Marine Consultancy, Project Management, Naval Architecture and Engineering, Survey and Positioning and Mooring Equipment Rental Services, in support of rig moves, FPSO mooring and hook-up, wave energy convertor deployment and wind turbine installation.

Interocean Oil Development Company and Interocean Oil Exploration Company v. Federal Republic of Nigeria (ICSID Case No. ARB/13/20) Procedural Order No. 6 (English) February 1, 2017 _ Marfin Investment Group Holdings S.A., Alexandros Bakatselos and others v. Republic of Cyprus (ICSID Case No. ARB/13/27) Procedural Order No. 3 (English)

Between Mr. Jonah Gbemre and Shell Petroleum Development. Company Nigeria Ltd, Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation,. Attorney General of the  Inventory of the archival records of Home Oil Company, founded in 1925 by Comments on exploration in Alberta foothills region, memo re possible oil and gas Inter-Ocean Grain Company, Winnipeg; comments re oil situation and stocks of  Interocean Oil Development Company and Interocean Oil Exploration Company v. Federal Republic of Nigeria (ICSID Case No. ARB/13/20), pending. Jun 27, 2019 29 See eg Interocean Oil Development Company and Interocean Oil Exploration Company v Federal Republic of Nigeria. (Decision on 

May 15, 2019 Nigeria faces a bill for $9bn in damages – payable to a company that In non- technical speak, wet gas is gas that emerges from the oil-drilling process. another ongoing dispute, this time involving US company Interocean, 

Interocean Oil Development Company and Interocean Oil Exploration Company v. Federal Republic of Nigeria (ICSID Case No. ARB/13/20) 9 being defended at no cost to the Federal Government of Nigeria. In other words, Aare Afe Babalola's services are being rendered pro bono to the Federal Government of Nigeria. On July 31, 2013, Interocean Oil Development Company and Interocean Oil Exploration Company (“Interocean” or the “Claimants”) submitted a Request for Arbitration to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID” or the “Centre”) against the Federal Republic of Nigeria (“Nigeria” or the “Respondent”). On July 31, 2013, Interocean Oil Development Company and Interocean Oil Exploration Company ("Interocean" or the "Claimants") submitted a Request for Arbitration to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ("ICSID" or the "Centre") against the Federal Republic of Nigeria ("Nigeria" or the "Respondent").

Galena Signal Oil Company, 1929-1931. Galt Ltd., G. F. and Gres Falls Development Company, Ltd, 1929, 1931 Interocean Oil Co. of Baltimore, 1932- 1934.

Sep 12, 2014 Interocean entities, comprising Interocean Oil Development Company (Nigeria) and Interocean Oil Exploration Company (Nigeria), companies  Interocean Oil Development Company and Interocean Oil Exploration Company v Federal Republic of Nigeria (ICSID Case No. ARB/13/20), case still pending. InterOcean Systems is a recognized leader with more than 70 years of continuous experience and product development of the highest quality offshore, defense, and environmental equipment. Products include oil spill monitoring systems, high-tension mooring release systems, advanced cable handling Company*. 41 Interocean Oil Development Company and Interocean Oil Exploration Company v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/20, Decision on the  Between Mr. Jonah Gbemre and Shell Petroleum Development. Company Nigeria Ltd, Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation,. Attorney General of the  Inventory of the archival records of Home Oil Company, founded in 1925 by Comments on exploration in Alberta foothills region, memo re possible oil and gas Inter-Ocean Grain Company, Winnipeg; comments re oil situation and stocks of 

Retailer of Logistics Services - Oil Gas Exploration & Drilling Service, Logistics & Freight Forwarding Service, Consultancy Service offered by Inter Ocean, New  Testified on behalf of a major oil and gas company defending a class action lawsuit involving fuel in oil and gas projects. Learned to value reserve reports and review development plans. (17) Interoceanic Corporation, v. Helm Düngemittel